The Harlequin Vintage Collection—A Lesson in Patience!

Vintage Collection Covers

by Executive Editor Marsha Zinberg

“Pardon my Body”? “I’ll Bury My Dead”? Such phrases might sound a bit jarring to an ear attuned to the more evocative and romantic titles usually associated with Harlequin. So what are we doing publishing books with such kitschy titles?

The short answer is that they are a small sampling of the type of fare our company began with. And this collection seemed a logical contribution to our 60th anniversary celebrations. Harlequin mounted an art exhibition in May, entitled The Heart of a Woman, which got people from many departments poring over old covers. Soon we had postcards and notepads—not to mention business cards—created that trumpeted our roots in the late 1940s. And folks both within our building and in the broader publishing community seemed completely taken with this vintage art. So why not publish a few of the texts that accompanied them?

The assignment: Go through our publication list (from Day One!) and look at the accompanying covers. Choose six books and reprint them, EXACTLY AS THEY WERE THEN, as a small collection to celebrate our sixty years in business. Let’s do them in October…that should give you guys loads of time!

Well, ok. We don’t need to create new art. We don’t need to edit the text. Should be a walk in the park, yes? Not so much, we discovered.

First roadblock: We did not possess physical copies of the books. In Harlequin’s early days, before people began thinking about “posterity”, it likely didn’t occur to employees that we might actually want to keep one copy of each book! We’ve been doing that for decades now, of course, but apparently we didn’t sixty years ago. So we actually had to make use of the Internet, and hunt down in used book stores the titles we couldn’t locate. It goes without saying that we had no digital files of either the text or the art, so the text had to be painstakingly key-stroked to create new text files, and the cover images had to be digitized as well.

Next: choosing the books. We had a few limitations here. We wanted books whose cover art appealed to us, and we had to be in physical possession of the book, but in some cases, once we started reading the text, we simply couldn’t see publishing the story, for a host of reasons….content, language, political correctness, etc. Several were eliminated, no matter how striking the cover!

Now for the books: Remember, our intention was to publish the stories in their original form. But once we immersed ourselves in the text, our eyes grew wide. Our jaws dropped. Social behavior—such as hitting a woman—that would be considered totally unacceptable now was quite common sixty years ago. Scenes of near rape would not sit well with a contemporary audience, we were quite convinced. We therefore decided to make small adjustments to the text, only in cases where we felt scenes or phrases would be offensive to a 2009 readership. Also, grammar and spelling standards have changed quite a bit in sixty years. But that did entail a text edit, which we had not anticipated. AND, we had to clear those adjustments with the current copyright holders, if we had been able to locate them.

And of course, the covers: Though we used the original covers, they had to be scanned and touched up. In addition, we felt it important to give the potential purchasers some context for our decision to publish the books as well as some cues that this was in fact not standard Harlequin fare at all: i.e. these stories are mostly written by men, and romance is not usually a key element in the plot! So we redesigned the back covers and spines, and reproduced the red dye on the page edges, for added authenticity.

Everyone in house has taken such interest and pride in this project, and we’re delighted that the collection is now out in the marketplace. We hope they will also accomplish what the cover art exhibition attempted to do: “offer a unique insight into the profound changes that have occurred in women’s lives over the past six decades—from shifts in private desires to shifts in the politics of gender”!

To purchase books from the Vintage Collection, visit www.eHarlequin.com.

And PS—keep entering the Susan Wiggs Lakeshore Christmas contest!

Posted on This entry was posted in New Releases and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

40 Responses to The Harlequin Vintage Collection—A Lesson in Patience!

  1. “Updating” a classic is making a new book entirely. Like colorizing Film Noir. I don’t think that the readership for these re-issues are going to be the ones complaining about the lack of PC in them. But I’m glad these are being re-issued at all. Just wish they were intact.

  2. Why did you even bother reissuing? The entire point of vintage is that it reflects its era. Removing the unpleasant aspects defeats the purpose and is insulting to readers.

  3. Harlequin - A Lesson in... bowdlerization

    Oh Dear… “small adjustments to the text”

    I work for a library consortia, and guess what Marsha, we’re no longer purchasing from your company.

    Who the Aich-Ee-double-hockey-sticks do you think you are!

  4. Pingback: FiledBy | Blog » PW’s Person of the Year + Harlequin’s Woes

  5. Like so many other posters, I was thrilled when I found out you were reprinting classic pulps.

    Then I saw that you were censoring them. There is no way that I’m going to buy a rewritten pulp. Absolutely no way.

    I understand your intentions, but the joy of these pulps is the way they capture the moods and styles of the time. To have them altered in any way to fit modern culture is totally inappropriate…it would be like going to a museum and finding dresses and pants painted on the people in classical artwork.

    If you release more pulps and you don’t modify them, then I am DEFINITELY in line to buy them. Maybe all these comments have served to sway you. The idea is fantastic! Please, however, put a note on them that they are the original uncensored versions so I’ll know whether to buy them.

  6. Agree with all other posters. When early Tom Swift and Hardy Boys were reissued, the publisher added a forward explaining that problematical writing of the time of publication (overt racism for instance) was being left intact but the publisher did not in any way endorse these writings but left them intact as a record of the time. This is what you should have done. I came across your books and bought one out of curiosity which I am now about to read. I’m doubtful of my desire to buy more after finding that the books have been censored. I do not believe in censorship. How could you as a book publisher have thought this was a good idea? Correcting typos if you have to reproduce the text is one thing but bowdlerizing the text is something else again.

  7. Marguerite Hargrove

    I think this is a fantastic idea! Why don’t publishers re-print old books?? I recently paid $140 for a book I read as a teenager because it was the only one available.
    ALSO, is it possible to have a book re-printed that was published in 1980, since the publisher went bankrupt? Does that suspend the copyright?

    thanks for any help

    Maggie

  8. Pingback: Time Synchronisation

  9. Pingback: With republication, there are updating risks and rewards | Dear Author

  10. I have a couple thousand old Harlequin books. I have an entire collection of the Golden Harlequin Libray collection, i am trying to find a good home for them. Can anyone lead me in the right direction. If I don’t find a home for them they will sadley be burned.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>